
From Iraq to Ukraine and now, Syria...
Would the involvement of key political players result in greater problems for host nations?
Tapping on examples from 4 countries, the following sources explore key points of contention on both sides of the debate.
Whose side would you be on?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-08-28/fitzpatrick-syria/4918406
http://www.rferl.org/content/explainer_pros_cons_possible_military_intervention_in_syria/24525222.html
http://balinko.blogspot.sg/2007/04/humanitarian-intervention-pros-and-cons.html
http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debate:_Was_the_War_in_Iraq_worth_it%3F

http://www.e-ir.info/2011/05/12/american-intervention-in-failing-countries-is-neccessary/
http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/the-paralysis-over-Syria
http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/07/25/the-bend-of-power/
No comments:
Post a Comment